Scopus Publication Detail
The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in Scopus. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication.
Bare naked baskets: Ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets
Jaime Landman; Manoj Monga; Ehab A. El-Gabry; Jamil Rehman; David I. Lee; Sam Bhayani; Chandru P. Sundaram; Ralph V. Clayman (Profiled Author: Chandru P. Sundaram)
Journal of Urology. 2002;167(6):2377-2379.
AbstractPurpose: Lower pole renal access during flexible ureterorenoscopy is often limited by the active deflection capabilities of the ureteroscope. Deterioration in the deflection and flow capabilities of ureteroscopes occurs with the passage of instrumentation through the working channel. We performed in vitro evaluation of a novel technique using unsheathed nitinol baskets to minimize the deterioration in deflection and maximize the irrigant flow associated with instrument passage through the working channel during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Materials and Methods: Alterations in the irrigant flow and active deflection of 4 ureteroscopes from different manufacturers were evaluated. Each ureteroscope was evaluated with an empty working channel, and then with sheathed and unsheathed 2.2, 3 and 3.2Fr (Cook Urological, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana), 2.4 and 3Fr (Microvasive Urology, Natick, Massachusetts) nitinol baskets in the working channel. Results: With all baskets tested and in all ureteroscopes the deterioration in active deflection and irrigant flow was improved with the unsheathed baskets. The disassembled basket within the working channel allowed an additional 15 to 20 degrees of active deflection. In addition, the disassembled basket allowed for a 2 to 30-fold increase in irrigant flow compared with an intact basket. Conclusions: The combination of improved deflection and irrigant flow with this technique may improve ureteroscopic access to lower pole renal calculi.
PMID: 11992041
Scientific Context
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
Related Publications
-
1.
2003Jamil Rehman; Manoj Monga; Jaime Landman; David I. Lee; Tamer Felfela; Marius C. Conradie; Rajamahanty Srinivas; Chandru P. Sundaram; Ralph V. Clayman
Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths
Urology. 2003;61(4):713-718. -
2.
2001M. Monga; S. Bhayani; J. Landman; M. Conradie; C.P. Sundaram; R.V. Clayman
Ureteral access for upper urinary tract disease: The Access Sheath
Journal of Endourology. 2001;15(8):831-834. -
3.
2002Oleg A. Sapozhnikov; Vera A. Khokhlova; Michael R. Bailey; James C. Williams Jr.; James A. McAteer; Robin O. Cleveland; Lawrence A. Crum
Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2002;112(3 I):1183-1195.
Related Experts
Author of this Document
-
Internal ExpertsPublications
-
153









-
115









-
329









-
129









-
51









-
114











