• By Concept
  • By Last Name
  • By Full Text

Smith, Mark A

Publication Detail

The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.



Amyloid-beta in Alzheimer disease: the null versus the alternate hypotheses.

Hyoung-gon Lee; Xiongwei Zhu; Rudy J Castellani; Akihiko Nunomura; George Perry; Mark A Smith (Profiled Authors: Smith, Mark A; Zhu, Xiongwei; Perry, George)

Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 2103 Cornell Road, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 2007;321(3):823-9.

Abstract

For nearly 20 years, the primary focus for researchers studying Alzheimer disease has been centered on amyloid-beta, such that the amyloid cascade hypothesis has become the "null hypothesis." Indeed, amyloid-beta is, by the current definition of the disease, an obligate player in pathophysiology, is toxic to neurons in vitro, and, perhaps most compelling, is increased by all of the human genetic influences on the disease. Therefore, targeting amyloid-beta is the focus of considerable basic and therapeutic interest. However, an increasingly vocal group of investigators are arriving at an "alternate hypothesis" stating that amyloid-beta, while certainly involved in the disease, is not an initiating event but rather is secondary to other pathogenic events. Furthermore and perhaps most contrary to current thinking, the alternate hypothesis proposes that the role of amyloid-beta is not as a harbinger of death but rather a protective response to neuronal insult. To determine which hypothesis relates best to Alzheimer disease requires a broader view of disease pathogenesis and is discussed herein.

1 Originating Grant

Scientific Context

This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.

Related Grants

Related Publications