The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.
Impairment of nonverbal recognition in Alzheimer disease: a PET O-15 study.
K E Anderson; A M Brickman; J Flynn; N Scarmeas; R Van Heertum; H Sackeim; K S Marder; K Bell; J R Moeller; Y Stern (Profiled Author: Stern, Yaakov)
Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Taub Institute for Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize deficits in nonverbal recognition memory and functional brain changes associated with these deficits in Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: Using O-15 PET, we studied 11 patients with AD and 17 cognitively intact elders during the combined encoding and retrieval periods of a nonverbal recognition task. Both task conditions involved recognition of line drawings of abstract shapes. In both conditions, subjects were first presented a list of shapes as study items, and then a list as test items, containing items from the study list and foils. In the titrated demand condition, the shape study list size (SLS) was adjusted prior to imaging so that each subject performed at approximately 75% recognition accuracy; difficulty during PET scanning in this condition was approximately matched across subjects. A control task was used in which SLS = 1 shape. RESULTS: During performance of the titrated demand condition, SLS averaged 4.55 (+/-1.86) shapes for patients with AD and 7.53 (+/-4.81) for healthy elderly subjects (p = 0.031). However, both groups of subjects were closely matched on performance in the titrated demand condition during PET scanning with 72.17% (+/-7.98%) correct for patients with AD and 72.25% (+/-7.03%) for elders (p = 0.979). PET results demonstrated that patients with AD showed greater mean differences between the titrated demand condition and control in areas including the left fusiform and inferior frontal regions (Brodmann areas 19 and 45). CONCLUSIONS: Relative fusiform and inferior frontal differences may reflect the Alzheimer disease (AD) patients' compensatory engagement of alternate brain regions. The strategy used by patients with AD is likely to be a general mechanism of compensation, rather than task-specific.
1 Originating Grant
30 September 1997 - 31 August 2002
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING
Total Funding: $ 2,129,131
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
Serge Gauthier; Murat Emre; Martin R Farlow; Roger Bullock; George T Grossberg; Steven G PotkinCurrent medical research and opinion 2003;19(8):707-14.
T Fuchsberger; H J Möller; H HampelMMW Fortschritte der Medizin 2003;145 Suppl 2():49-52, 54.
A Kurz; B Van BaelenDementia and geriatric cognitive disorders 2004;18(2):217-26.
Appears in this Publication
Author of this Publication