• By Concept
  • By Last Name
  • By Full Text

Perry, Robert H

Publication Detail

The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.



Effects of aging and cholinergic deafferentation on putative muscarinic cholinergic receptor subtypes in rat cerebral cortex.

A B Norman; S N Blaker; L Thal; I Creese (Profiled Author: Thal, Leon J)

Neuroscience letters 1986;70(2):289-94.

Abstract

Despite a 34% decrease in the activity of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the rat cerebral cortex following lesions of the nucleus basalis, there were no changes in the Bmax of the antagonist ligands [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ((-)-[3H]QNB) or (-)-[3H]N-methylscopolamine ((-)-[3H]NMS). Furthermore, this treatment produced no significant change in the proportions or affinities of muscarinic receptors having high and low affinity for pirenzepine or (-)-NMS. These data indicate that putative M2 muscarinic receptors are not restricted to ChAT-containing neurons in rat cerebral cortex. In senescent compared to mature rats there was no significant loss of ChAT activity although a significant reduction in the Bmax of both (-)-[3H]QNB and (-)-[3H]NMS binding was observed. However, no changes in the competition of pirenzepine or (-)-NMS for the remaining (-)-[3H]QNB binding sites were observed. Therefore, there is no evidence for any differential regulation of either putative muscarinic receptor subtype in response to cholinergic deafferentation or as a function of the natural aging process.

3 Originating Grant

Scientific Context

This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.

Related Grants

Related Publications