The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.
Encounters with pharmaceutical sales representatives among practicing internists.
Department of Medicine, Union Memorial Hospital, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21218, USA.
The American journal of medicine 1999;107(2):149-52.
BACKGROUND: Although pharmaceutical sales representatives provide physicians with information on new products, these encounters have rarely been studied in practice settings. We examined these interactions among practicing internists and assessed whether prior residency policies limiting pharmaceutical sales representative access affected the subsequent behavior of practitioners. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey of the internal medicine staffs of a medical school hospital and two affiliated community hospitals. A second request was sent to nonresponders. After the second mailing, a random sample of nonresponders was compared with a similar sample of respondents. Multivariate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 346 (40%) internists who responded, 22% were women and 60% were trained in university hospitals. There were no differences in gender, subspecialization, or type of training when survey responders and nonresponders were compared. Two hundred eighty-seven (83%) physicians had met with pharmaceutical sales representatives within the previous year, of whom 248 (86%) had received drug samples. Having had a policy that limited access to pharmaceutical sales representatives during residency did not affect the subsequent likelihood of seeing these representatives (P = 0.20) or accepting samples in practice (P = 0.99). Those describing themselves as busy practitioners were significantly less likely to abstain from meeting pharmaceutical sales representatives (OR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.6, P <0.001). Those with very frequent contacts (>10 times/month) were virtually all busy practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Encounters between physicians and pharmaceutical sales representatives are common in internal medicine practice, especially in busy offices. Policies designed to limit pharmaceutical sales representative access during residency do not appear to affect the subsequent likelihood of meeting with pharmaceutical sales representatives or accepting samples.
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
S M Wright; D E Kern; K Kolodner; D M Howard; F L BrancatiThe New England journal of medicine 1998;339(27):1986-93.
Susan G Sherman; Crystal M Fuller; Nina Shah; Danielle V Ompad; David Vlahov; Steffanie A StrathdeeJournal of psychoactive drugs 2005;37(4):437-43.
Fannie Fonseca-Becker; Maria J Perez-Patron; Beatriz Munoz; Michael O'Leary; Evelyn Rosario; Sheila K WestJournal of immigrant and minority health / Center for Minority Public Health 2010;12(3):354-60.
Appears in this Publication
Author of this Publication