Publication Detail
The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.
Injection rates for neuroangiography: results of a survey.
D M Yousem; B C Trinh (Profiled Author: David Yousem)
Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Houck B-112, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2001;22(10):1838-40.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Injection rates have attracted scrutiny because of an incident of an aneurysm rupturing during arteriography. We sought to determine the current injection rates for neuroangiography in the setting of aneurysm evaluation. METHODS: An e-mail survey was distributed to 90 neuroradiology program directors within the United States and Canada. The injection rates and total volumes of contrast material injected for the common carotid, internal carotid, and vertebral arteries were provided for an "average" adult individual evaluated for intracranial aneurysms. RESULTS: Sixty-three (70.0%) program directors replied to the survey. Of these, five perform hand injections only and provided approximate values. The mean injection rates (SD) and total volumes (SD) for common carotid arteries were 7.2 cm(3)/s (1.8) and 9.9 cm(3) (2.0), respectively; for internal carotid arteries, 5.8 cm(3)/s (1.4) and 7.9 cm(3) (1.5); and for vertebral arteries, 5.4 cm(3)/s (1.2) and 7.8 cm(3) (1.7). The modes (rate/total) for the common carotid, internal carotid, and vertebral arteries were 7/12, 6/8, and 5/8, respectively. Forty-eight (81.4%) of 59 respondents did not believe a reduction in current injection rates would lead to a diminution in complications of arteriography. CONCLUSION: The rates of injection of contrast material in the United States for neuroradiologic studies show great variability. It does not seem that reducing arteriographic complications is an impetus to reduce injection rates. The values in this survey can provide "industry norms" for injections in the common carotid, internal carotid, and vertebral arteries if these rates are challenged.
Scientific Context
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
Related Publications
-
1.
1989N Sadato; D Rigamonti; Y Numaguchi
Neuroradiology 1989;31(4):364-5. -
2.
2009Wilson P Daugherty; Michelle J Clarke; Harry J Cloft; Giuseppe L Lanzino
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 2009;4(6):528-31. -
3.
1998C S Ogilvy; A Quinones-Hinojosa
Surgical treatment of vertebral and posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms.
Neurosurgery clinics of North America 1998;9(4):851-60.
Related Topics
Appears in this Publication
Related Experts
Author of this Publication
-
Internal ExpertsPublications
-
161









-
158









-
208









-
166









-
366









-
151










