• By Concept
  • By Last Name
  • By Full Text

Thomas Hartung

Publication Detail

The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.



Workgroup report: incorporating in vitro alternative methods for developmental neurotoxicity into international hazard and risk assessment strategies.

Sandra Coecke; Alan M Goldberg; Sandra Allen; Leonora Buzanska; Gemma Calamandrei; Kevin Crofton; Lars Hareng; Thomas Hartung; Holger Knaut; Paul Honegger; et al. (Profiled Authors: Ellen Silbergeld; Alan Goldberg; Thomas Hartung)

ECVAM-European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission, Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy. sandra.coecke@jrc.it
Environmental health perspectives 2007;115(6):924-31.

Abstract

This is the report of the first workshop on Incorporating In Vitro Alternative Methods for Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) Testing into International Hazard and Risk Assessment Strategies, held in Ispra, Italy, on 19-21 April 2005. The workshop was hosted by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) and jointly organized by ECVAM, the European Chemical Industry Council, and the Johns Hopkins University Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing. The primary aim of the workshop was to identify and catalog potential methods that could be used to assess how data from in vitro alternative methods could help to predict and identify DNT hazards. Working groups focused on two different aspects: a) details on the science available in the field of DNT, including discussions on the models available to capture the critical DNT mechanisms and processes, and b) policy and strategy aspects to assess the integration of alternative methods in a regulatory framework. This report summarizes these discussions and details the recommendations and priorities for future work.

Scientific Context

This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.

Related Publications