The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.
Independent but coordinated trials: insights from the practice-based Opportunities for Weight Reduction Trials Collaborative Research Group.
Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Jeanne M Clark; Karen E Emmons; Reneé H Moore; Gary G Bennett; Erica T Warner; David B Sarwer; Gerald J Jerome; Edgar R Miller; Sheri Volger; et al. (Profiled Authors: Jeanne Clark; Gerald Jerome; Richard Moore; Lawrence Appel; Edgar Miller; Hsin Chieh Yeh; Thomas Louis)
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. firstname.lastname@example.org
Clinical trials (London, England) 2010;7(4):322-32.
BACKGROUND: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) funded three institutions to conduct effectiveness trials of weight loss interventions in primary care settings. Unlike traditional multi-center clinical trials, each study was established as an independent trial with a distinct protocol. Still, efforts were made to coordinate and standardize several aspects of the trials. The three trials formed a collaborative group, the 'Practice-based Opportunities for Weight Reduction (POWER) Trials Collaborative Research Group.' PURPOSE: We describe the common and distinct features of the three trials, the key characteristics of the collaborative group, and the lessons learned from this novel organizational approach. METHODS: The Collaborative Research Group consists of three individual studies: 'Be Fit, Be Well' (Washington University in St. Louis/Harvard University), 'POWER Hopkins' (Johns Hopkins), and 'POWER-UP' (University of Pennsylvania). There are a total of 15 participating clinics with ~1100 participants. The common primary outcome is change in weight at 24 months of follow-up, but each protocol has trial-specific elements including different interventions and different secondary outcomes. A Resource Coordinating Unit at Johns Hopkins provides administrative support. RESULTS: The Collaborative Research Group established common components to facilitate potential cross-site comparisons. The main advantage of this approach is to develop and evaluate several interventions, when there is insufficient evidence to test one or two approaches, as would be done in a traditional multi-center trial. LIMITATIONS: The challenges of the organizational design include the complex decision-making process, the extent of potential data pooling, time intensive efforts to standardize reports, and the additional responsibilities of the DSMB to monitor three distinct protocols.
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
Adam Cheng; Elizabeth A Hunt; Aaron Donoghue; Kristen Nelson; Judy Leflore; JoDee Anderson; Walter Eppich; Robert Simon; Jenny Rudolph; Vinay Nadkarni; et al.Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 2011;6(1):34-41.
Heidi S Harvie; Lior Lowenstein; Tola B Omotosho; Tatiana Sanses; Stephanie Molden; Janet Hardy; Linda Brubaker;Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery 2012;18(2):89-92.
Barbara Resnick; Elizabeth Galik; Ingrid Pretzer-Aboff; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Karen Russ; Jeanne Cayo; Sheryl ZimmermanResearch in gerontological nursing 2009;2(1):30-8.
Appears in this Publication
Author of this Publication