The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.
[Cost effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole/itraconazole in the prophylactic treatment of invasive fungal infections in Mexico].
Kely Rely; Pierre K Alexandre; Guillermo Salinas Escudero (Profiled Author: Pierre Alexandre)
Economista de la salud, CEAHealthTech, México.
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 2011;14(5 Suppl 1):S39-42.
UNLABELLED: Cost effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole/itraconazole therapy in the prophylaxis against invasive fungal Infections among high-risk neutropenic patients in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness and long-term combined effects of Posaconazole versus fluconazole/itraconazole (standard azole) therapy in the prophylaxis against invasive fungal Infections among high-risk neutropenic patients in Mexico. METHODS: A previously validated Markov model was used to compare the projected lifetime costs and effects of two theoretical groups of patients, one receiving Posaconazole and the other receiving standard azole. The model estimates total costs, numbers of IFIs, and QALY per patient in each prophylaxis group. To extrapolate trial results to a lifetime horizon, the model was extended with one-month Markov cycles in which mortality risk is specific to the underlying disease. Data on the probabilities of IFI were obtained from Study Protocol PO1899. Drug costs were taken from average wholesale drug reports for 2009. Cost and health effects were discounted at 5% according to the Mexican guideline. The analysis was conducted from the Mexican healthcare perspective using 2008 unit cost prices. RESULTS: Our model projects an accumulated cost to the Mexican healthcare system per patient receiving the Posaconazol regimen of $US 5,634 compared to $US 7,463 for the standard azole regimen. The accumulated discounted effect is 3.13 LY or 2.25 QALYs per patient receiving Posaconazol, compared to 2.96 LY or 2.13 QALYs per patient receiving standard azole. Posaconazol remained the dominant strategy across each scenario. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis tested numerous assumptions about the model cost and efficacy parameters and found that the results were robust to most changes. CONCLUSION: Posaconazole provides modest incremental benefits compared with standard azole therapy in the prophylaxis against IFIs among high-risk neutropenic patients. Routine Posaconazole use appears a cost saving when the likelihood of IFIs or the cost of treatment medications is high.
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
S J Chanock; T J WalshBone marrow transplantation 1996;18 Suppl 3():S15-20.
Oliver A Cornely; Johan Maertens; Drew J Winston; John Perfect; Andrew J Ullmann; Thomas J Walsh; David Helfgott; Jerzy Holowiecki; Dick Stockelberg; Yeow-Tee Goh; et al.The New England journal of medicine 2007;356(4):348-59.
Kely Rely; Sebastián Emanuel González McQuire; Pierre K Alexandre; Guillermo Salinas EscuderoValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 2011;14(5 Suppl 1):S43-7.
Appears in this Publication
Author of this Publication