Henry Pitt

Publication Detail

The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in PubMed. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication. If any grants are referenced by the publication, they will be listed here as well.

Gender influences sphincter of Oddi response to cholecystokinin in the prairie dog.

S Tierney; Z Qian; B Yung; P A Lipsett; H A Pitt; S Sostre; K D Lillemoe (Profiled Authors: Samuel Sostre; Pamela Lipsett; Henry Pitt)

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-4603, USA.
The American journal of physiology 1995;269(4 Pt 1):G476-80.

Although gallstones and disorders of biliary tract motility are both more common in women than men, sphincter of Oddi motility has not previously been compared between the sexes. In this study, cholescintigraphy (under ketamine and diazepam anesthesia) was used to determine gallbladder emptying rate and ejection fraction in response to cholecystokinin (CCK) in eight male and six female prairie dogs fed a nonlithogenic diet. Ten days later, under alpha-chloralose anesthesia, sphincter of Oddi phasic wave activity was monitored for 10-min intervals before (control), during 20 min of CCK infusion, and for 20 min after infusion. Gallbladder emptying rate and ejection fraction and baseline sphincter of Oddi frequency, amplitude, and motility index (= frequency x amplitude) did not differ significantly between the sexes. Sphincter of Oddi phasic wave frequency was increased during CCK infusion in both males and females, but the change in amplitude was significantly greater in females, than males. We conclude that the increased incidence of biliary tract disease in women may be due to altered sphincter of Oddi hormonal response.

Scientific Context

This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts and related grants with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.