Scopus Publication Detail
The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in Scopus. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication.
Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: Perceptions of faculty and resident physicians
Peter J. Embi; Thomas R. Yackel; Judith R. Logan; Judith L. Bowen; Thomas G. Cooney; Paul N. Gorman (Profiled Authors: Thomas (Tom) Cooney; Paul Gorman; Judith (Judy) Logan; Thomas Yackel)
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2004;11(4):300-309.
AbstractObjectives Computerized physician documentation (CPD) has been implemented throughout the nation's Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) and is likely to increasingly replace handwritten documentation in other institutions. The use of this technology may affect educational and clinical activities, yet little has been reported in this regard. The authors conducted a qualitative study to determine the perceived impacts of CPD among faculty and housestaff in a VAMC. Design A cross-sectional study was conducted using semistructured interviews with faculty (n=10) and a group interview with residents (n=10) at a VAMC teaching hospital. Measurements Content analysis of field notes and taped transcripts were done by two independent reviewers using a grounded theory approach. Findings were validated using member checking and peer debriefing. Results Four major themes were identified: (1) improved availability of documentation; (2) changes in work processes and communication; (3) alterations in document structure and content; and (4) mistakes, concerns, and decreased confidence in the data. With a few exceptions, subjects felt documentation was more available, with benefits for education and patient care. Other impacts of CPD were largely seen as detrimental to aspects of clinical practice and education, including documentation quality, workflow, professional communication, and patient care. Conclusion CPD is perceived to have substantial positive and negative impacts on clinical and educational activities and environments. Care should be taken when designing, implementing, and using such systems to avoid or minimize any harmful impacts. More research is needed to assess the extent of the impacts identified and to determine the best strategies to effectively deal with them.
PMID: 15064287 PMCID: PMC436079
Scientific Context
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
Related Publications
-
1.
2005Po-Yin Yen; Paul Gorman
Usability testing of digital pen and paper system in nursing documentation.
AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium. 2005:844-848. -
2.
2003H.J. Murff; T.K. Gandhi; A.K. Karson; E.A. Mort; E.G. Poon; S.J. Wang; D.G. Fairchild; D.W. Bates
International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2003;71(2-3):137-149. -
3.
1999J.S. Ash; P.N. Gorman; W.R. Hersh; M. Lavelle; S.B. Poulsen
Perceptions of house officers who use physician order entry.
Proceedings / AMIA . Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium. 1999:471-475.
Related Topics
Appears in this Document
Related Experts
Author of this Document
-
Internal ExpertsPublications
-
69









-
88









-
34









-
68









-
130









-
158











Export