Scopus Publication Detail
The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in Scopus. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication.
Critical thinking skills in nursing students: Comparison of simulation-based performance with metrics
Laura J. Fero; John M. O'Donnell; Thomas G. Zullo; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Julius Kitutu; Joseph T. Samosky; Leslie A. Hoffman (Profiled Author: Laura J Fero)
Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010;66(10):2182-2193.Abstract
Aim: This paper is a report of an examination of the relationship between metrics of critical thinking skills and performance in simulated clinical scenarios. Background: Paper and pencil assessments are commonly used to assess critical thinking but may not reflect simulated performance. Methods: In 2007, a convenience sample of 36 nursing students participated in measurement of critical thinking skills and simulation-based performance using videotaped vignettes, high-fidelity human simulation, the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory and California Critical Thinking Skills Test. Simulation-based performance was rated as 'meeting' or 'not meeting' overall expectations. Test scores were categorized as strong, average, or weak. Results: Most (75·0%) students did not meet overall performance expectations using videotaped vignettes or high-fidelity human simulation; most difficulty related to problem recognition and reporting findings to the physician. There was no difference between overall performance based on method of assessment (P = 0·277). More students met subcategory expectations for initiating nursing interventions (P ≤ 0·001) using high-fidelity human simulation. The relationship between videotaped vignette performance and critical thinking disposition or skills scores was not statistically significant, except for problem recognition and overall critical thinking skills scores (Cramer's V = 0·444, P = 0·029). There was a statistically significant relationship between overall high-fidelity human simulation performance and overall critical thinking disposition scores (Cramer's V = 0·413, P = 0·047). Conclusion: Students' performance reflected difficulty meeting expectations in simulated clinical scenarios. High-fidelity human simulation performance appeared to approximate scores on metrics of critical thinking best. Further research is needed to determine if simulation-based performance correlates with critical thinking skills in the clinical setting. © 2010 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.
Kristie Long Foley; Sonia J. Crandall; Geeta George; Malika Roman; John G. SpanglerJournal of Cancer Education. 2003;18(3):134-141.
Deborah G. Latimer; Deirdre K. ThornlowJournal of Professional Nursing. 2006;22(2):79-83.
Linda S. Mullen; Ronald O. Rieder; Robert A. Glick; Bruce Luber; Paul J. RosenAmerican Journal of Psychiatry. 2004;161(9):1658-1664.
Appears in this Document