• Home
  •  > Scopus Publication Detail

Scopus Publication Detail

The publication detail shows the title, authors (with indicators showing other profiled authors), information on the publishing organization, abstract and a link to the article in Scopus. This abstract is what is used to create the fingerprint of the publication.


Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Evanguelos Xylinas; Michael Rink; Eugene K. Cha; Thomas Clozel; Richard K. Lee; Harun Fajkovic; Evi Comploj; Giacomo Novara; Vitaly Margulis; Jay D. Raman; et al.

(Profiled Authors: Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis)

European Urology. 2014;65(1):210-217.

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach to the bladder cuff during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Objectives: To compare the oncologic outcomes following RNU using three different methods of bladder cuff management. Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective analysis of 2681 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at 24 international institutions from 1987 to 2007. Intervention: Three methods of bladder cuff excision were performed: transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of distal ureter management on intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results and limitations: Of the 2681 patients, 1811 (67.5%) underwent the transvesical approach; 785 (29.3%), the extravesical approach; and 85 (3.2%), the endoscopic approach. There was no difference in terms of RFS, CSS, and OS among the three distal ureteral management approaches. Patients who underwent the endoscopic approach were at significantly higher risk of intravesical recurrence compared with those who underwent the transvesical (p = 0.02) or extravesical approaches (p = 0.02); the latter two groups did not differ from each other (p = 0.40). Actuarial intravesical RFS estimates at 2 and 5 yr after RNU were 69% and 58%, 69% and 51%, and 61% and 42% for the transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic approaches, respectively. In multivariate analyses, distal ureteral management (p = 0.01), surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic; p = 0.02), previous bladder cancer (p < 0.001), higher tumor stage (trend; p = 0.01), concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) (p < 0.001), and lymph node involvement (trend; p < 0.001) were all associated with intravesical recurrence. Excluding patients with history of previous bladder cancer, all variables remained independent predictors of intravesical recurrence. Conclusions: The endoscopic approach was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates. Interestingly, concomitant CIS in the upper tract is a strong predictor of intravesical recurrence after RNU. The association of laparoscopic RNU with intravesical recurrence needs to be further investigated. © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Scientific Context

This section shows information related to the publication - computed using the fingerprint of the publication - including related publications, related experts with fingerprints representing significant amounts of overlap between their fingerprint and this publication. The red dots indicate whether those experts or terms appear within the publication, thereby showing potential and actual connections.

Related Publications

Related Topics

Appears in this Publication Appears in this Document

Related Experts

Author of this Publication Author of this Document